WikiLeaks is offering $10,000 for further information regarding a reporter who they claim facilitated lead to the arrest of knowledge contractor Reality Winner, 25, who allegedly divulged restricted NSA documents to an unnamed media outlet believed to be the Intercept.
The documents showed that the NSA believes Russian military ability implemented a cyberattack on a United States voting software supplier periods before the presidential election, the Intercept reported on Monday.
WikiLeaks affirms the reporter spoke with a government official with whom he had a prior relationship and told them they had received documentation in the mail that were postmarked from Augusta, Georgiawhere Winner lives.
WikiLeaks articulates the money will be given to someone who helps lead to the reporters public exposure& termination.
WikiLeaks problems a US $10,000 honor for knowledge leading to the public exposure& end of this’ reporter ‘: https :// t.co/ W9wijCk5d3
— WikiLeaks (@ wikileaks) June 6, 2017
Winner is accused of removing classified cloth from a government facility and forwarding it to a bulletin store. Prosecutors allege Winner admitted to intentionally leaking both documents when she was arrested on June 3 in Georgia.
According to the Department of Justice, Winner published both documents around May 5 and unlawfully held it before casting it to a information shop. The FBI was notified of an upcoming narration by the news shop subsequently that month, according to Winners affidavit.
An internal audit found that Winner was one of six people who had reproduced the document and that Winner had e-mail contact with the bulletin outlet.
According to Errata Security, a security research blog, Winner may have been tracked down due to roughly invisible yellowish scatters that are displayed on published sheets. When deciphered, the dots leave a detailed log of when the page was engraved and the printers serial number.
— Quinn’s internet (@ quinnnorton) June 6, 2017
The Intercept posted the following statement on Tuesday saying that they had no knowledge Winner was the source of such documents they received.
The website added that it was important be considered that the number of complaints and declaration contain unproven assertions.
Winner faces allegations that have not been demonstrated, the statement reads. The same is true of the FBIs claims about how it came to arrest Winner.
The Intercept “re saying it” will not be noting farther, quoting the ongoing investigation.
While some people are criticizing the Intercept for contacting the government to verify the documentand adding that they came from Georgia, as Wikileaks claimssome reporters are protecting the word outlet.
Journalist Yashar Ali started a tweet thread please explain why the Intercept needed to handle the situation the way they did.
Ali said by someone anonymously forwarding a document to a news organization, it can be assumed that the leaker made efforts to make sure they would not get caught. When the Intercept asked if the document was real, it was obvious that the Department of Justice would begin looking into where the documents originated, Ali claims.
You can read all of Alis tweets here.
Update 1:30 pm CT, June 6 : Added statement from the Intercept.