WikiLeaks is offering $10,000 for information about a reporter who they declaration facilitated lead to the arrest of intelligence contractor Reality Winner, 25, who were reportedly leaked restricted NSA documents to an unnamed media outlet believed to be the Intercept.
The documents showed that the NSA speculates Russian military knowledge executed a cyberattack on a United States voting software supplier epoches before the presidential election, the Intercept reported on Monday.
WikiLeaks assertions the reporter spoke with a government official with whom he had a prior relationship and told them they had received documentation in the mail “thats been” postmarked from Augusta, Georgiawhere Winner lives.
WikiLeaks replies the money will be given to someone who helps lead to the reporters public exposure& termination.
WikiLeaks problems a US $10,000 honor for intelligence leading to the public exposure& expiration of this’ reporter ‘: https :// t.co/ W9wijCk5d3
— WikiLeaks (@ wikileaks) June 6, 2017
Winner is accused of removing categorized textile from a government facility and forwarding it to a word outlet. Attorneys do Winner admitted to intentionally disclosing both documents when she was arrested on June 3 in Georgia.
According to the Department of Justice, Winner published both documents around May 5 and unlawfully retained it before mailing it to a news outlet. The FBI was notified of an upcoming narration by the word store afterwards that month, according to Winners affidavit.
An internal audit found that Winner was one of six people who had reproduced the document and that Winner had e-mail contact with the news outlet.
According to Errata Security, a defence study blog, Winner may have been tracked down due to roughly invisible yellow-bellied scatters that appear on etched pages. When deciphered, the dots generate a detailed log of when the sheet was engraved and the printers serial number.
— Quinn’s internet (@ quinnnorton) June 6, 2017
The Intercept posted the following statement on Tuesday saying that they had no knowledge Winner was the source of the document they received.
The website added that it was important to keep in mind that the number of complaints and affidavit contain unproven assertions.
Winner faces charges that have not been proven, the statement speaks. The same is true of the FBIs claims about how it came to arrest Winner.
The Intercept “re saying it” will not be observation farther, quoting the ongoing investigation.
While some people are criticizing the Intercept for contacting the government to verify the documentand adding that they came from Georgia, as Wikileaks claimssome reporters are representing the information outlet.
Journalist Yashar Ali started a tweet thread explaining why the Intercept needed to handle the situation the way they did.
Ali said by someone anonymously forwarding official documents to a news organization, it can be assumed that the leaker made efforts to make sure they would not be caught. When the Intercept asked if the document was real, it was obvious that the Department of Justice would begin looking into where both documents originated, Ali claims.
You can read all of Alis tweets here.
Update 1:30 pm CT, June 6 : Added statement from the Intercept.