Tag Archives: facebook

Facebook’s new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about dictatorship | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an evacuate pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to reach your road through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from communicating letters to family to decipher report and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat makes you lodge money in your bank, search for a library book, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of your life, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the pattern for the future of his firm. Zuckerberg has long craved Facebook to be the operating system of “peoples lives”- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s world-wide domination.

This, better than any exhaust and distracting pledge of” pivoting to privacy”, illustrates Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He expressed willingness to unite the messaging works of his three non-Facebook stages, Instagram( 1 billion useds ), WhatsApp( 1. five billion users ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion consumers ). He would extend the strong encryption that recognise WhatsApp from many other messaging works( although not, greatly, from growing and encrypted potential opponents like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move easily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use competing works like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging assistances. Subduing all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement entails the WhatsApp won’t change as many dreaded- vacating encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward consolidating these services to work and examine a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion consumers and ripening, will still watch everything you do, will dictate what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will feature circulars were aimed at you on the basis of the massive surveillance arrangement Facebook has built over the past decade. It will still disperse photographs of puppies and babes along with hate speech, plot ideologies, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at democracy and starve journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its indefensible publicity about a “pivot” or a “move” provides more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It confuses journalists and reviewers from several revealings that show how brazenly Facebook manipulates and abuses its users.

For years we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to secure the login process for services and scaffolds. Facebook itself inspires us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from prying attentions or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for useds to opt out. This applies people at risk for the sake of Facebook’s ability to trail them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our quantities will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one busines, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that practice formerly it came to light. This was the latest in a series of shows about how Facebook tracks parties- even those who are not Facebook consumers- through mobile designs and applications. Nothing in Zuckerberg’s recent edict modifications this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of people around the world. It plans to create a new crypto money for its consumers. WhatsApp useds could soon use the currency to ordering meat gives or acquire learn tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp customers start sending coin to relatives in other countries employing a currency Facebook self-restraints and pays Facebook grants. That could push away numerous unsavory business that commission high fees. It could also consolidate even more inexplicable world-wide supremacy in Facebook.

The ultimate unification of these platforms under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively block any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take times for the European Union or the United District government to muster the legal organization and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could allege that this new, blended assistance has shared its back-end data and core parts for too long. There would be nothing distinct to sever. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private messages protect users better than the only other major rival in the nations of the world, WeChat.

In the coming duel against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private messages from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that offerings WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat consumers assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal dictatorials like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I suspect. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, “weve had” take Mark Zuckerberg at his parole. Too many times he has disclosed us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about demolishing other companies and consolidating world power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE

Facebook’s new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about dictatorship | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an drain pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to stir your path through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from moving themes to pedigree to see news and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat tells you deposit fund in your bank, search for a library journal, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of their own lives, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the modeling for the future of his fellowship. Zuckerberg has long missed Facebook to be the operating system of our lives- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s world domination.

This, better than any exhaust and distracting assurance of” pivoting to privacy”, interprets Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He expressed willingness to unite the messaging services of his three non-Facebook pulpits, Instagram( 1 billion useds ), WhatsApp( 1. 5 billion users ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion customers ). He would extend the strong encryption that discriminates WhatsApp from many other messaging assistances( although not, vastly, from originating and encrypted potential contestants like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move easily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use compete business like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging assistances. Humiliating all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement represents the WhatsApp won’t change as many panicked- abandoning encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward unifying these services to work and ogle a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion consumers and flourishing, will still watch everything you do, will dictate what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will feature circulars targeted at you on the basis of the massive surveillance organization Facebook has built over the last decades. It will still give photographs of puppies and babes along with hate speech, conspiracy speculations, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at democracy and starve journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its unjust promotion about a “pivot” or a “move” suffices more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It confuses journalists and reviewers from several disclosures that show how brazenly Facebook employs and abuses its users.

For years we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to lock the login process for services and platforms. Facebook itself promotes us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from levering eyes or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for customers to opt out. This employs beings at risk for the sake of Facebook’s ability to racetrack them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our figures will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one busines, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that practice formerly it came to light. This was the latest in a series of shows about how Facebook tracks parties- even those who are not Facebook customers- through mobile designs and applications. Nothing in Zuckerberg’s latest bulletin changes this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of people around the world. It plans to create a new crypto currency for its useds. WhatsApp users could soon use the currency to tell food bringings or purchase civilize tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp users start casting fund to relatives in other countries using a money Facebook powers and payments Facebook sanctions. That could push away many unsavory services that indictment high fees. It had the opportunity to solidify even more unaccountable world influence in Facebook.

The eventual unification of these pulpits under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively block any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take years for the European Union or the United Government government to muster the legal foundation and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could plead that this new, unified assistance has shared its back-end data and core capacities for too long. There would be nothing distinct to separate. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private words protect users better than the only other major rival in the nations of the world, WeChat.

In the coming duel against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private words from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that volunteers WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat consumers assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal despotics like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I approximate. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, “weve had” taken Mark Zuckerberg at his text. Too many times he has revealed us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about defeating other companies and consolidating world power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE

Patriotic Facebook page contacting millions of Americans is run by Ukrainians

/ by / Tags:

” I Love America” is a Facebook page with more than 1 million partisans drawn to its hyper-patriotic content, scheme beliefs, and support for Donald Trump.

This morning, Popular Information, a newsletter by Judd Legum, broke the news that” I Love America” is run by Ukrainians. It’s part of an extensive network of Ukrainian-run sheets that routinely reach millions of unsuspecting Americans. These pages often cross-promote and cross-post each other’s content.

googletag.cmd.push( run() googletag.display( ‘inline_1’ ); ); sendGoogleAnalyticsAdImpressionIfGaExists( ‘inline_1’ );

According to Facebook’s transparency feature,” I Love America” is managed by 13 people; 10 are in Ukraine, and one each are in France, Kazakhstan, and the United State. Many of its berths are divisive and inflammatory, such as the meme it posted on Sept. 9 of an eagle’s face overlaid with the verse,” Do you agree? Instead of taxes helping to fund Middle East countries that hate America, we should be helping the homeless veterans who love America. Yes or no ?” This upright has 65,000 likes, 25,000 shares, and 11,000 comments.

From June 16 to Sept. 22, Facebook social analytics busines Crowdtangle found that” I Love America” had reached more than 20 million users.

Legum was revealed that” I Love America” also recycles content that was posted on pages managed by the Internet Research Agency, a Russian troll farm that formed forgery Facebook pages to benefit President Donald Trump in the 2016 referendum. This material includes pro-Trump propaganda, debunked conspiracy thoughts, and memes that denigrate undocumented immigrants and express disapproval of the NFL anthem protests.

googletag.cmd.push( role() googletag.display( ‘inline_2’ ); ); sendGoogleAnalyticsAdImpressionIfGaExists( ‘inline_2’ );

The destinations appear to be to support Trump’s reelection and foster discord by playing on existing separations in American society.

I Love America/ Facebook

Other sheets in the network of Ukrainian-managed sheets include patriotic-themed” Like our page if you are proud to be an American” and” Everyone should respect and stand for our American Flag. God Bless .”

Some focus on cute swine and Jesus.

” Cute or Not ?,” a sheet run by eight Ukrainians, normally persists to stock epitomes of puppies with the occasional police pup give in. Recently, Legum found that” Cute or Not ?” had begun cross-posting content from Ukrainian-managed” God bless Donald and Melania Trump and God bless America” and” US Federal Insider” pages. The” I Love Jesus Forever” sheet has also begun to cross-posting pro-Trump memes from” God bless Donald Trump and God bless America .”

By amassing big followings –” Cute or Not ?” alone has more than 400,000 — these pages had generated an gathering for this content. Numerous would think it curiou for a group of foreigners to create English-language pages for Christians and animal devotees that purport to be American. Their true purpose may have been discovered when these sheets recently began posting pro-Trump content, such as the meme below, which” I Love Jesus Forever” cross-posted from” God bless Donald Trump and God bless America” on August 16.

Don’t scroll past without saying’ Hi’ to us!

Posted by God bless Donald Trump and God bless America on Friday, August 16, 2019

Facebook told Legum that these pages are not flouting its Community Standards. The fellowship proscribes” coordinated inauthentic behavior ,” defined as” when groups of pages or people be taken together to misinform others about who they are or what they are doing .” The programme censors multiple histories from working in conjunction to mislead people about their content’s source; in order to win shares, likes, or clicks; or to conceal or enable Community Standards violations.

Nevertheless, experts Legum spoke with were troubled that foreign actors were exploiting Facebook to influence Americans and concerned that Facebook was not intervening.

The New School professor and social media expert David Carroll told Legum that this proposes Facebook has ” not decided to use their own detection technology to prevent further dissemination by’ inauthentic coordination.'”

There is thus far no evidence that sheets in the Ukrainian network are affiliated with a foreign authority. Grafika investigation director Ben Nimmo told Legum that the sheets paucity the finesse of government actors, and opined that the sheets appeared more like clickbait operations.

But, as Legum pointed out, the effect may be the same.

” Still, the impact on American voters could be the same, especially if the tactics include bombarding Americans with spuriou and divisive political fabric ,” he wrote.

READ MORE

Facebook’s new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about domination | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an evacuate pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to prepare your course through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from casting words to family to read information and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat lets you lodge money in your bank, sought for a library notebook, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of their own lives, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the model for the future of his firm. Zuckerberg has long wanted Facebook to be the operating system of our lives- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s world domination.

This, better than any drain and distracting assurance of” pivoting to privacy”, clarifies Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He expressed their commitment to federate the messaging works of his three non-Facebook scaffolds, Instagram( 1 billion useds ), WhatsApp( 1. 5 billion users ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion useds ). He would extend the strong encryption that distinguishes WhatsApp from many other messaging services( although not, vastly, from ripening and encrypted potential opponents like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move easily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use competing assistances like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging business. Humbling all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement necessitates the WhatsApp won’t change as numerous feared- vacating encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward unifying these services to work and ogle a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion useds and originating, will still watch everything you do, will prescribe what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will peculiarity ads were aimed at you based on the massive surveillance organization Facebook has built over the last decades. It will still give photographs of puppies and newborns along with hate speech, scheme possibilities, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at democracy and starve journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its unjust promotion about a “pivot” or a “move” helps more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It disconcerts writers and critics from various revelations that show how brazenly Facebook manipulates and abuses its users.

For times we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to fasten the login process for services and platforms. Facebook itself encourages us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from prying sees or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for users to opt out. This applies people at risk for purposes of Facebook’s ability to way them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our digits will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one assistance, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that practice formerly it came to light. This was the latest in a series of shows about how Facebook tracks beings- even those who are not Facebook users- through mobile devices and applications. Good-for-nothing in Zuckerberg’s recent proclamation changes this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of parties around the world. It plans to create a new crypto money for its useds. WhatsApp users could soon use the currency to guild meat bringings or purchase train tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp consumers start mailing money to relatives in other countries using a money Facebook holds and fees Facebook permits. That could push away many unsavory works that accusation high fees. It could also consolidate even more inexplicable global strength in Facebook.

The eventual merger of these stages under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively block any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take times for the European Union or the United Country government to muster the law organization and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could plead that this new, combined busines has shared its back-end data and core parts for too long. There would be nothing distinct to separate. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private words protect users better than the only other major rival in the nations of the world, WeChat.

In the coming battle against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private letters from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that presents WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat useds assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal dictatorials like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I approximate. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, “weve had” taken Mark Zuckerberg at his parole. Too many times he has disclosed us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about defeating other companies and consolidating global power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE

Facebook’s new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about dominance | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an exhaust pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to draw your lane through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from casting contents to household to see information and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat lets you deposit coin in your bank, search for a library volume, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of their own lives, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the model for the future of his firm. Zuckerberg has long craved Facebook to be the operating system of “peoples lives”- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s world domination.

This, better than any evacuate and confusing pledge of” pivoting to privacy”, clarifies Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He expressed their commitment to federate the messaging services of his three non-Facebook pulpits, Instagram( 1 billion users ), WhatsApp( 1. 5 billion consumers ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion users ). He would expand the strong encryption that recognise WhatsApp from many other messaging assistances( although not, significantly, from changing and encrypted potential competitors like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move readily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use competing services like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging business. Humiliating all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement necessitates the WhatsApp won’t change as numerous dreaded- vacating encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward unifying these services to work and look a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion useds and originating, will still watch everything you do, will prescribe what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will feature advertisings were aimed at you on the basis of the massive surveillance system Facebook has built over the past decade. It will still assign photographs of puppies and babies along with hate speech, conspiracy theories, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at republic and deprive journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its unwarranted publicity about a “pivot” or a “move” provides more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It disconcerts columnists and reviewers from several revelations that show how brazenly Facebook exploits and abuses its users.

For years we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to assure the login process for services and platforms. Facebook itself helps us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from levering attentions or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for users to opt out. This applies people at risk for the sake of Facebook’s ability to line them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our counts will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one assistance, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that practice once it came to light. This was the latest in a series of disclosures about how Facebook tracks parties- even those who are not Facebook customers- through mobile designs and applications. Nothing in Zuckerberg’s recent bulletin changes this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of people various regions of the world. It plans to create a brand-new crypto currency for its useds. WhatsApp useds could soon use the currency to tell meat deliveries or acquisition improve tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp useds start casting money to relatives in other countries using a money Facebook commands and payments Facebook allows. That could push away many unsavory business that commission high fees. It could also consolidate even more unaccountable world-wide ability in Facebook.

The ultimate uniting of these stages under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively block any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take times for the European Union or the United Country government to muster the legal foundation and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could allege that this new, coalesced busines has shared its back-end data and core capacities for too long. There would be nothing distinct to sever. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private messages protect users better than the only other major rival in the nations of the world, WeChat.

In the coming battle against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private letters from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that gives WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat customers assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal dictatorials like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I guess. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, “weve had” taken Mark Zuckerberg at his message. Too many times he has betrayed us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about defeating other companies and consolidating global power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE

Facebook contractors divulge the frights of moderating graphic material

/ by / Tags:

Contractors who moderated content for Facebook are speaking out about brutal working conditions-and even breaking their non-disclosure agreements to do so, the Verge reports.

A dozen current and former employees of Cognizant, a Florida-based company that enforces Facebook’s parish standards, have detailed not only issues within their workplace but also the mental trauma caused by viewing countless hours of graphic content.

Cognizant received a $ 200 million contract from Facebook to moderate content for two years. Employees make as little as $28,800 a year and are often diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder due to daily show to videos imaging everything from brats being murdered to animals being subjected to torture.

Keith Utley, a 42 -year-old employee, died after having a heart attack at his desk.

” The stress they put on him–it’s unworldly ,” one of his coworkers said.” I did a lot of coaching. I expended some time talking with him about things he was having editions seeing. And he was always worried about getting fuelled .”

Employees only learned of his death after his father arrived to collect his belongings.

” Everyone at leadership was telling beings he was fine–‘Oh, he’ll be okay, ‘” one co-worker said.” They wanted to play it down. I think they were worried about parties discontinuing with the emotional affect it would have been able to .”

Facebook told the Daily Dot that it was aware of Utley’s passing and emphasized its support for contracted workers.

” Our thinkings go out to Keith Utley’s family, friends and everyone who worked with him ,” a Facebook spokesperson said.” We go to great lengths to support the people that do this important work, and take any workplace concerns very seriously .”

Cognizant laborers be claimed that” pubic hair and other bodily waste” were found on a regular basis at their workstations. Clients of sexual harassment and murderou threats were also apparently ignored by the company’s higher-ups. In an attempt to cope with the job, many employees said booze and marijuana were regularly ingested in the parking lot.

Although many of those speaking out have chosen to remain anonymous, given that all employees were required to sign non-disclosure agreements, three hires opted to discuss their experiences on the record.

Speagle, who was 23 years old when he was first offered a position at Cognizant, said he was initially told that he would be helping organizations analyze their engagement on Facebook. It wasn’t until after he was hired that he discovered he would instead be moderating content.

Speagle, who has a history of feeling and feeling, said the company never attempted to learn whether he was mentally fit for the role.

Speagle was repeatedly subjected to watching a video of an iguana being tortured and killed by two teenage sons. Yet, Speagle indicated by the video was never removed from the platform.

” They saved reposting it again and again and again ,” Speagle echoed.” It prepared me so enraged. I had to listen to its screams the working day .”

Another former employee, identified only as Marcus, said he thought he was desensitized to violence because of his military profession.” A video of a humanity slaughtering puppies with a baseball bat” been subjected to him to break down on his lunch break.

Melynda Johnson, another former employee, shared similar suffers and likewise withdrew how the only bathroom at Cognizant was regularly covered in blood and feces.

A former employee referred to as Lola too reported how she was forced to work while sick, given that the company did not afford sick leave and simply allotted hires several bathroom breaks per daytime. A administrator reportedly wreaked her a trash can to vomit in while at her desk instead of sending her home.

Other happens involved managers taunting a female employee whose colostomy container severed and an employee who was never removed after threatening to” shoot up the building .”

Facebook told the Daily Dot that it takes action when necessary to ensure the wellbeing of its contracted personnel. The corporation said here today recently hired someone to help address problems facing the social media company’s contractors.

” We work with our content evaluate partners to provide a level of support and compensation that induces service industries ,” a Facebook spokesperson said. There will unavoidably be hire challenges or dissatisfaction that call our commitment to this work and our partners’ hires into question. When the circumstances authorize action on the part of management, we make sure it happens .”

Facebook also said that it is working to better screen contractors and offer psychological and mental support to those in need.

The Daily Dot has reached out to Cognizant.

READ MORE

Facebook’s new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about subordination | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,
DTAG 2 TT DTAG 3 TT DTAG 4 TT DTAG 5 TT DTAG 6 TT DTAG 7 TT DTAG 8 TT By Holly Riordan Updated July 12, 2019 DTAG 9 TT DTAG 10 TT DTAG 11 TT DTAG 12 TT IMG 2 TT DTAG 13 TT By Holly Riordan Updated July 12, 2019

When you take a risk on desire, you’re saying jailer you to all of the people who hurt you in the past. You’re establishing it clear the luggage they “ve brought you” hasn’t secured you down. It hasn’t smash your tone. Taking a risk on adoration proves you’re strong enough to affection again, to let your susceptible side show, to let your heart lope loose.

When you take a risk on adore, you’re taking a risk on yourself. You’re deciding you deserve an opportunity at happy. You’re deciding there’s no reason why this person would turn you down. Even if you get scorned in the end, you should be proud of yourself for having the confidence to go after what you want. You should be happy you loved yourself enough to make a move.

When you take a risk on enjoy, you’re escaping from your solace zone. You’re taking a step forward instead of hovering in a safe lieu. Most beings never have the gallantry to walk away from the familiar and hug the unknown. Most parties settle for an average, mediocre life instead of trying to create one that would make them feel fulfilled. That’s something you should brag about, that’s something special.

When you take a risk on adore, you’re spreading kindness. Even if you don’t end up dating the other person, you’re paying them a impressive kudo. You’re doing them feel better about themselves. You’re constructing them feel insured and admired and evaluated. You’re giving their pride a boost it probably needs.

Stop hiding your feelings and be brave enough to wear your center on your sleeve. If you never tell your person how you feel about them, then they’re never going to know how you feel about them. They’re going to have to guess what’s on your imagination the same way you’ve been approximating what’s on their brain — and that never aims well. It’s much easier to spill your feelings than to play games for months on end. It’s much easier to air your excitements instead of keeping them caught inside.

When you take a risk on cherish, you’re not going to regret it, so stop waiting for the right moment and textbook him now. Ask him to meet you for coffee. Ask him to invest some time at your region. Admit how you feel about him. Admit what you want from him. You might end up get spurned, but it’s better than wondering bout the what ifs. It’s better than dwelling in your loneliness, than wondering if this person ever felt the same way about you, than living a life filled with regrets.

When you take a risk on cherish, you might end up getting your center break-dance, but at least you’ll know where you stand with this person. At least you’ll know whether you’re on the same page. At least you’ll have permission to move on from them and find someone better, someone who would never dream of turning you down, someone who realizes what a catch “youve”.

DTAG 14 TT HTAG 1 TTRelatedHETAG 1 TT DTAG 15 TT DTAG 16 TT DTAG 17 TT FTAG 1 TT IMG 3 TT DTAG 18 TT HTAG 2 TT You Aren’t Going To Grow Unless You Take Risks HETAG 2 TT DTAG 19 TT DTAG 20 TT FTAG 2 TT IMG 4 TT DTAG 21 TT HTAG 3 TT Your Forever Person Should Encourage You To Take Risks HETAG 3 TT

Read more: https :// thoughtcatalog.com/ holly-riordan/ 2019/07/ take-a-risk-on-love

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an empty pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to represent your lane through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from transporting themes to house to learning information and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat gives you situate fund in your bank, sought for a library book, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of their own lives, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the pattern for the future of his firm. Zuckerberg has long wanted Facebook to be the operating system of our lives- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s world domination.

This, better than any evacuate and disconcerting donate of” pivoting to privacy”, excuses Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He guaranteed to unite the messaging works of his three non-Facebook scaffolds, Instagram( 1 billion useds ), WhatsApp( 1. five billion consumers ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion consumers ). He would expand the strong encryption that distinguishes WhatsApp from many other messaging assistances( though not, greatly, from germinating and encrypted potential competitors like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move readily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use competing business like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging business. Suppressing all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement entails the WhatsApp won’t change as many horror- abandoning encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward mingling these services to work and gaze a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion users and changing, will still watch everything you do, will dictate what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will boast advertisings targeted at you based on the massive surveillance organization Facebook has built over the past decade. It will still dispense photographs of puppies and babies along with hate speech, scheme conjectures, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at democracy and deprive journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its unjustified publicity about a “pivot” or a “move” helps more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It confuses writers and reviewers from several revelations that show how brazenly Facebook manipulates and abuses its users.

For years we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to secure the login process for services and scaffolds. Facebook itself inspires us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from prying seeings or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for customers to opt out. This sets beings at risk to the purposes of Facebook’s ability to trail them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our digits will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one assistance, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that practice once it came to light. This was the latest in a series of revealings about how Facebook tracks parties- even those who are not Facebook consumers- through mobile inventions and applications. Nothing in Zuckerberg’s recent bulletin changes this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of parties various regions of the world. It plans to create a new crypto currency for its users. WhatsApp useds could soon use the currency to tell nutrient bringings or obtain learn tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp consumers start sending coin to relatives in other countries using a currency Facebook restrains and fees Facebook licenses. That could push away many unsavory services that attack high fees. It could also consolidate even more inexplicable world-wide power in Facebook.

The eventual uniting of these scaffolds under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively block any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take times for the European Union or the United Country government to muster the legal organization and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could allege that this new, federated busines has shared its back-end data and core functions for too long. There would be nothing distinct to sever. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private meanings protect users better than the only other major rival in the nations of the world, WeChat.

In the coming combat against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private messages from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that volunteers WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat users assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal authoritarians like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I suspect. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, “weve had” taken Mark Zuckerberg at his word. Too many times he has divulged us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about overcoming other companies and consolidating global power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE

Facebook’s brand-new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about power | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an drain pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to move your channel through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from transmitting messages to clas to reading news and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat tells you situate money in your bank, sought for a library work, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of their own lives, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the modeling for the future of his firm. Zuckerberg has long wanted Facebook to be the operating system of our lives- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s global domination.

This, better than any evacuate and confusing assurance of” pivoting to privacy”, explains Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He expresses its determination to federate the messaging services of his three non-Facebook programmes, Instagram( 1 billion users ), WhatsApp( 1. five billion useds ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion customers ). He would expanding the strong encryption that distinguishes WhatsApp from many other messaging business( even if they are not, significantly, from originating and encrypted potential competitors like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move easily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use vie services like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging assistances. Humbling all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement symbolizes the WhatsApp won’t change as numerous feared- abandoning encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward unifying these services to work and search a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion customers and originating, will still watch everything you do, will dictate what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will feature circulars been aimed at you based on the massive surveillance organisation Facebook has built over the past decade. It will still disperse photographs of puppies and babies along with hate speech, conspiracy conjectures, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at republic and starve journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its undue publicity about a “pivot” or a “move” dishes more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It distracts reporters and pundits from various revealings that show how brazenly Facebook manipulates and abuses its users.

For times we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to secure the login process for services and pulpits. Facebook itself helps us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from prying sees or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for useds to opt out. This puts people at risk for purposes of Facebook’s ability to way them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our counts will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one busines, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that practice formerly it came to light. This was the most recent developments in a series of revelations about how Facebook tracks parties- even those who are not Facebook useds- through mobile inventions and applications. Nothing in Zuckerberg’s recent proclamation converts this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of people around the world. It plans to create a brand-new crypto currency for its customers. WhatsApp customers could soon use the currency to prescribe meat bringings or purchase train tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp customers start transmitting coin to relatives in other countries using a money Facebook ensures and remittances Facebook authorizes. That could push away numerous unsavory services that attack high fees. It is also able to consolidate even more inexplicable world supremacy in Facebook.

The ultimate amalgamation of these pulpits under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively impede any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take years for the European union or the United States government to muster the law foot and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could plead that this new, consolidated work has shared its back-end data and core offices for too long. There would be nothing distinct to sever. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private contents protect users better than the only other major rival in the world, WeChat.

In the coming engagement against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private meanings from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that offerings WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat consumers assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal authoritarians like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I suspect. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, “were having” take Mark Zuckerberg at his parole. Too many times he has exposed us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about overcoming other companies and consolidating world-wide power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Subject at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE

Facebook’s brand-new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about domination | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an drain pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to stir your style through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from mailing letters to family to see news and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat lets you deposit fund in your bank, sought for a library notebook, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of your life, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the pattern for the future of his fellowship. Zuckerberg has long missed Facebook to be the operating system of our lives- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s world domination.

This, better than any vacate and distracting donate of” pivoting to privacy”, explains Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He expresses its determination to unite the messaging assistances of his three non-Facebook scaffolds, Instagram( 1 billion useds ), WhatsApp( 1. 5 billion customers ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion useds ). He would extend the strong encryption that distinguishes WhatsApp from many other messaging services( even if they are not, vastly, from changing and encrypted potential challengers like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move easily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use competing assistances like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging business. Humbling all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement necessitates the WhatsApp won’t change as many panicked- abandoning encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward unifying these services to work and appear a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion customers and originating, will still watch everything you do, will dictate what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will feature circulars targeted at you based on the massive surveillance arrangement Facebook has built over the past decade. It will still distribute photographs of puppies and newborns along with hate speech, plot ideologies, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at republic and starve journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its indefensible hype about a “pivot” or a “move” serves more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It distracts journalists and pundits from various disclosures that show how brazenly Facebook employs and abuses its users.

For years we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to secure the login process for services and stages. Facebook itself supports us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from levering attentions or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for customers to opt out. This places parties at risk for purposes of Facebook’s they are able to way them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our multitudes will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one busines, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that rehearsal once it came to light. This was the latest in a series of discoveries about how Facebook tracks people- even those who are not Facebook users- through mobile inventions and applications. Good-for-nothing in Zuckerberg’s recent proclamation changes this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of people around the world. It plans to create a brand-new crypto currency for its consumers. WhatsApp consumers could soon use the currency to prescribe meat bringings or obtain learn tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp users start transmitting coin to relatives in other countries using a currency Facebook self-restraints and remittances Facebook licenses. That could push away many unsavory assistances that indictment high fees. It is also able to solidify even more unaccountable world-wide superpower in Facebook.

The ultimate amalgamation of these stages under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively obstruct any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take times for the European Union or the United Commonwealth government to muster the legal foot and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could plead that this new, mingled work has shared its back-end data and core serves for too long. There would be nothing distinct to sever. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private themes protect users better than the only other major rival in the world, WeChat.

In the coming engagement against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private meanings from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that gives WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat customers assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal despotics like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I suspect. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, “were having” take Mark Zuckerberg at his term. Too many times he has revealed us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about overcoming other companies and consolidating global power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Subject at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE

Facebook’s brand-new move isn’t about privacy. It’s about domination | Siva Vaidhyanathan

/ by / Tags: ,

Mark Zuckerberg announced on Wednesday that Facebook would be pivoting to privacy. Thats an exhaust pledge

If you have visited China in recent years you might have discovered how difficult it is to stimulate your mode through without WeChat, an all-purpose mobile phone application. People in China use WeChat for everything from moving letters to lineage to reading information and opinion to ordering food to paying at vending machines to paying for a taxi. WeChat gives you situate money in your bank, search for a library volume, make a medical appointment, conduct business conference calls, and interact with the government. In China, WeChat is the operating system of your life, as it is for almost 1.1 billion people.

For Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, WeChat is both his greatest challenge and the example for the future of his corporation. Zuckerberg has long missed Facebook to be the operating system of our lives- at least for those who live outside of China. WeChat is what Facebook has yet to become. WeChat, should it move beyond China and its diaspora, is also the greatest threat to Facebook’s world-wide domination.

This, better than any exhaust and distracting pledge of” pivoting to privacy”, clarifies Zuckerberg’s announcement on Wednesday. He pledged to unite the messaging works of his three non-Facebook platforms, Instagram( 1 billion customers ), WhatsApp( 1. 5 billion users ), and Messenger( 1. 3 billion useds ). He would expanding the strong encryption that distinguishes WhatsApp from many other messaging assistances( even if they are not, greatly, from ripening and encrypted potential competitors like Telegram and Signal) to the other two platforms and allow content to move easily among them.

Facebook hopes to draw those who use compete business like Telegram, Signal, Skype, Google’s Hangouts( formerly known as GChat ), Apple’s IMessage, or classic SMS to Facebook’s various and soon-to-be-united messaging business. Humbling all those apps, along with email and old-fashioned phone calls, would be a major step toward becoming the operating system of our lives.

Basically, this announcement necessitates the WhatsApp won’t change as numerous feared- vacating encryption and becoming more like Messenger. Instead, Messenger will become more like WhatsApp. This would be the first step toward unifying these services to work and appear a lot more like- and thus prepared to compete against- WeChat.

Despite all the hype, Zuckerberg said nothing about changing Facebook itself. Facebook, with 2.3 billion customers and thriving, will still watch everything you do, will dictate what you read and see in your Newsfeed, and will feature ads been aimed at you based on the massive surveillance organization Facebook has built over the past decade. It will still assign photographs of puppies and babies along with hate speech, scheme possibilities, and calls to genocide. It will still chip away at republic and deprive journalism.

This recent announcement, with all its unjustified hype about a “pivot” or a “move” suffices more of Zuckerberg’s interests. It distracts journalists and reviewers from various shows that demonstrate how brazenly Facebook manipulates and abuses its users.

For years we have been instructed to use” two-factor authentication” to secure the login process for services and platforms. Facebook itself inspires us to have it send a message to our mobile phones to confirm that we are who we say we are before logging in. But Facebook does not protect your number from levering sees or advertisers. Using a phone number anyone can look up a Facebook profile, and there is no way for useds to opt out. This puts people at risk for the sake of Facebook’s they are able to track them. Given that identity on WhatsApp is mobile-number specific, it’s likely that our counts will be the source of more vulnerability in the future.

And last week we learned that at least 11 favourite health applications were sharing extremely sensitive personal data with Facebook through mobile phones. At least one busines, Flo Period and Ovulation Tracker, decided to cease that practice formerly it came to light. This was the latest in a series of revealings about how Facebook tracks parties- even those who are not Facebook users- through mobile machines and applications. Nothing in Zuckerberg’s recent notice alters this.

Beyond abuses, Facebook has another plan to make itself essential to the daily lives of people around the world. It plans to create a new crypto money for its customers. WhatsApp consumers could soon use the currency to order food bringings or acquisition study tickets. Imagine if the 1.5 billion WhatsApp consumers start casting money to relatives in other countries using a money Facebook dominances and pays Facebook licenses. That could push away many unsavory services that cost high fees. It is also able to consolidate even more unaccountable global strength in Facebook.

The ultimate unification of these stages under the mothership, Facebook, could effectively impede any governmental attempts to sever Instagram and WhatsApp from the company. It might take times for the European Union or the United Position government to muster the law foundation and political will to break up Facebook. By that time Zuckerberg could allege that this new, amalgamated assistance has shared its back-end data and core offices for too long. There would be nothing distinct to separate. Plus, Zuckerberg could argue that encrypted private messages protect users better than the only other major rival in the nations of the world, WeChat.

In the coming duel against WeChat, Facebook can use its pledge to protect private letters from snooping states to his advantage. TenCent, the company that offers WeChat, is very close to the government of the People’s Republic of China and WeChat consumers assume their communication is subject to state surveillance. Facebook might collaborate with brutal despotics like Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines, but it’s still not yet as dangerous as WeChat. That’s something, I predict. And it might be enough to ensure domination for many years to come.

For too long, we have take Mark Zuckerberg at his text. Too many times he has betrayed us. Let’s not fall for it again. This move is not about protecting you. It’s about demolishing other companies and consolidating global power.

Siva Vaidhyanathan is the Robertson Professor of Media Study at the University of Virginia and the author of Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy

READ MORE