Tag Archives: Americas

Colombian veterinary accused of ‘cruel’ surgery to turn puppies into dose mules

/ by / Tags: , , , ,

Andres Lopez Elorez faces US court for embed dogs with heroin after being expelled from Spain

A veterinarian is accused of implanting liquid heroin in puppies to turn them into drug mules for a Colombian trafficking ring.

Colombian-born Andres Lopez Elorez shall be included in a US federal court in Brooklyn on Tuesday after being extradited from Spain, where he was arrested in 2015.

Lopez Elorez, 38, who likewise goes by the surname Lopez Elorza, absconded in 2005 when powers arrested about two dozen believed traffickers in Colombia.

His arrest was part of a 12 -year Drug Enforcement Administration investigation. If convicted on conspiracy accuses, he gambles spending at least 10 times and potentially life behind bars.

Authorities allege that between September 2004 and January 2005 Elorez was a member of a Colombian ring smuggling heroin into the US using numerous procedures, including human and dog couriers.

It is believed the dogs were cast on commercial flights to New York, where the medications were cut out of them. Researchers belief the puppies would have died in the process, but it was unknown how many were involved.

” As alleged in the accusation, Elorez is not only a drug trafficker, he also revealed a veterinarian’s pledge to prevent animal sustain where reference is employed his surgical abilities in a cruel scheme to smuggle heroin in the abdomens of puppies ,” US advocate Richard Donoghue said.” Bird-dogs are man’s best friend and, as the defendant is about to learn, we are drug dealers’ worst antagonist .”

Ten puppies search for and during a 2005 attacked on a farm in Colombia, DEA officials said. Five intent up running away, three died from infection and two were adopted, including information that became a drug-sniffing dog for Colombian police, officials said.

” Over season, dope organisations’ unquenchable thirst for profit conducts them to do unbelievable crimes like expending innocent puppies for dose hiding ,” heads of state of the DEA’s New York split, James Hunt, said.

Associated Press and Agence France-Presse contributed to this report .

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

Colombian veterinary accused of ‘cruel’ surgery to turn puppies into drug mules

/ by / Tags: , , , ,

Andres Lopez Elorez faces US court for implanting bird-dogs with heroin after being expelled from Spain

A veterinarian is accused of implanting liquid heroin in puppies to turn them into drug mules for a Colombian trafficking ring.

Colombian-born Andres Lopez Elorez is indicated in a US federal courtroom in Brooklyn on Tuesday after being extradited from Spain, where he was arrested in 2015.

Lopez Elorez, 38, who too goes by the surname Lopez Elorza, absconded in 2005 when approvals arrested about two dozen supposed traffickers in Colombia.

His arrest was part of a 12 -year Drug Enforcement Administration investigation. If convicted on plot fees, he risks spending at least 10 times and potentially life behind bars.

Authorities allege that between September 2004 and January 2005 Elorez was a member of a Colombian ring smuggling heroin into the US use many techniques, including human and dog couriers.

It is believed the dogs were communicated on commercial flights to New York, where the dopes were cut out of them. Examiners guess the puppies would have died in the process, but it was unknown how many were involved.

” As alleged in the accusation, Elorez is not only a drug trafficker, he also disclosed a veterinarian’s pledge to prevent animal agony where reference is exploited his surgical abilities in a inhuman scheme to smuggle heroin in the abdomens of puppies ,” US advocate Richard Donoghue said.” Puppies are man’s best friend and, as the defendant is about to learn, we are drug dealers’ worst antagonist .”

Ten puppies were found during a 2005 attacked on a farm in Colombia, DEA officials said. Five objective up running away, three died from infection and two were adopted, including information that became a drug-sniffing dog for Colombian police, officials said.

” Over epoch, narcotic organisations’ unquenchable thirst for profit extends them to do inconceivable crimes like using innocent puppies for medication privacy ,” the head of the DEA’s New York disagreement, James Hunt, said.

Associated Press and Agence France-Presse contributed to this report .

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

Here’s the main issue behind the Jamie Oliver jerk rice row- and it’s not cultural appropriation

/ by / Tags: , , , ,

People object to a minted man making money from an inauthentic bowl, while those who eat the real thing get diddly-squat

You can listen, even from a great distance, that some disagreements have a hot, insoluble core that won’t be easily cooled, in the same way that you can tell by watching a inn fighting whether it is about a fraternal sellout or somebody spilling something. The fracas over the luminary cook Jamie Oliver’s punchy jerk rice- which led to the loss the Labour MP Dawn Butler to tweet:” Your jerk rice is not OK. This appropriation from Jamaica needs to stop”- is just such a row.

Oliver fans forced themselves awake. Which bit of his rice is wrong, again? That he would use spice that originated in another culture; that he would get the seasoning incorrect; or that he would misapply it to the wrong ingredient, “jerk” being intended for meat , not rice? What do the liberals want? Where was Butler when he started use mostarda di frutta on pasta? Won’t someone must be considered the Italians?” And what about tea ?”, included the contrarians.” Is that cultural appropriation? Now we’ve appropriated it, is anyone else drinking it proper it back down us ?” The untrained commentator, arriving from space, would assume we were a nation that strenuously and irrationally affection, or disliked, Oliver, whereupon discussing him at all itself becomes an act of culture appropriation. But that’s not really what’s going on.

If you never borrow anything, that is a creed of insularity and parochialism. Because this is an easy point to score, a lot of people are coming in to bat for Oliver who wouldn’t exit near his moron rice with a 10 -ft spoon, and never tasted his jollof rice either, with which he doubly reviled an whole continent in 2014, building it nothing like it was supposed to taste, and clumsily attributing it to Ghana when its causes are struggled. It was like going in to a Greek restaurant and ordering a Turkish coffee, except multiplied by 17 and offering to make it yourself, with cloves.

But what parties are angry about isn’t the homely cross-pollination of one appetizing thing with another, but that a person who is already minted is making a load of money out of a bastardised form of something, while the people who eat the genuine dish reach diddly-squat from it. It is just another inequality story, erupting through the social scalp like a pimple. We’ll squeeze it for a bit, it will hurt, some gunk will come out. The underlying provisions will remain unchanged, until a fresh steam begins, perhaps when Jeremy Paxman propels his own street-style label.

What is illuminating is that all this illustrates the place made a decade ago in the book The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Ever Do Better that difference is bad for everyone; it becomes everyone angrier, rich and good; everyone’s mental health wanes, whatever their class. Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, the book’s scribes, were never great plungers on why this should be, opting not to blur their clear epidemiological sign with thought. But you can understand on a gut degree why it might adversely affect all of us. Oliver probably does not wake up thinking of himself as emblematic of a rigged organization. If all debate about equality is refracted through individuals, then nobody is liable enough to stand for the unfairnes of advantage, and if you want to represent the underdog, you have to be so subjugated yourself that you are almost dead. Personal credentials become the beginning and end of a battle that cannot be prevailed on that territory. A tranche of belief will conclude that the debate is too monotonous to bother with, or, as Peter York once archly said:” I’m just waiting for Gardeners’ Question Time to start talking about the inequality between my wisteria and my hydrangeas .”

I don’t have the answer, by the way: but I know it won’t be resolved by rice, and it would help if the super-rich tried superhumanly hard-handed not to be jerks.

Is Michael Gove barking up the right tree?

Michael Gove is not the go-to politician if your main issue is puppies- shortly thereafter his stand against hound” beating collars”( remote-controlled collars that allow you to blast your pup with an electric shock or, more commonly, cold air when it misbehaves ), he went back on the relevant recommendations of a proscribe. Now, though, he has come out against puppy farms. He will find few people who won’t support him in this: nonetheless much you distrust him and despair of his Singapore-in-the-channel vision for Britain, you must despise more anyone who would malnourish a puppy for money. If there is one thing besides Bake Off we could all sign up to, surely this would be it?

Gove, like Boris Johnson, has seemingly turned to Facebook for intel on how to build himself seem leaderly, except his bird-dog whistle is not Islamophobia but real dogs. There is a peculiar quality to the animal-rights activism on Facebook. You would think it would be fluffy because swine are, but it often resolves up in a peculiar residence, calling for the death penalty for unscrupulous puppy-farm owners or old-time evidence revitalization justice, where people who leave puppies in red-hot autoes are, themselves, locked down hot cars.

The great boon of pup-rights is that they can’t readily be aligned politically, so people who wouldn’t be happy with far-right connotations, or those of the left, can colonize snugly into some righteous indignation that doesn’t involve hit their neighbours’ spaces. This is the happy place of the modern Tory moderate: all the force and zeal of communal feeling, but none of the unfortunate and ugly ethno-nationalism.

The only problem is that anger is not politically constructive: some spleen is inevitable, but exclusively as a side-dish. For generative social perception, you may have to look somewhere other than social media.

No deal: how the euro has become the talk of British holidaymakers

” Imagine how cheap that would have been, before June 2016 …” This is the staple holiday conversation, replicated by every Brit in the eurozone, every seven times, sometimes amended by the odd:” Well, that would still have been expensive, even when you got EUR1. 39 to the PS1″, and culminating in the regular detonation:” One to bloody one! We might as well have gone to Sweden and waste five quid on an apple .” Many things could change the weather, when autumn comes: the issuance of the no-deal Armageddon scenarios may create MPs to their appreciations. But these undertakings in Carrefour, going pointlessly mugged to no one’s benefit, will supply an interesting background dirge.

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

Here’s the main issue behind the Jamie Oliver jerk rice row- and it’s not culture appropriation

/ by / Tags: , , , ,

People object to a minted male making money from an inauthentic recipe, while those who eat the real thing get diddly-squat

You can discover, even from a great distance, that some disputes have a hot, insoluble core that won’t be easily cooled, in the same way that you can tell by watching a tavern combat whether it is about a fraternal disloyalty or somebody spilling something. The fracas over the personality cook Jamie Oliver’s punchy jerk rice- which led to the loss the Labour MP Dawn Butler to tweet:” Your dork rice is not OK. This appropriation from Jamaica needs to stop”- is just such a row.

Oliver fans thrust themselves awake. Which bit of his rice is wrong, again? That he would use spice that originated in another culture; that he would get the seasoning wrong; or that he would misapply it to the wrong ingredient, “jerk” being intended for meat , not rice? What do the liberals miss? Where was Butler when he started applying mostarda di frutta on pasta? Won’t someone must be considered the Italians?” And what about tea ?”, contributed the contrarians.” Is that culture appropriation? Now we’ve appropriated it, is anyone else drinking it proper it back off us ?” The untrained observer, arriving from space, would assume we were a nation that furiously and irrationally affection, or disliked, Oliver, whereupon discussing him at all itself becomes an act of culture appropriation. But that’s not really what’s going on.

If you never borrow anything, that is a creed of insularity and parochialism. Because this is an easy point to score, a lot of people are coming in to bat for Oliver who wouldn’t extend near his jolt rice with a 10 -ft spoon, and never savoured his jollof rice either, with which he doubly reviled an whole continent in 2014, obliging it nothing like it was supposed to taste, and clumsily attributing it to Ghana when its ancestries are struggled. It was like going in to a Greek restaurant and ordering a Turkish coffee, except multiplied by 17 and offering to make it yourself, with cloves.

But what parties are angry about isn’t the homely cross-pollination of one yummy thing with another, but that a person who is already minted is making a load of coin out of a bastardised form of something, while the people who eat the genuine bowl make-up diddly-squat from it. It is just another inequality story, bursting through the social surface like a pimple. We’ll mash it for a bit, it will hurt, some gunk will come out. The underlying situations will remain unchanged, until a fresh steam explodes, perhaps when Jeremy Paxman propels his own street-style label.

What is illuminating is that all this illustrates the moment made a decade ago in the book The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Virtually Ever Do Better that difference is bad for everyone; it builds everyone angrier, rich and good; everyone’s mental health wanes, whatever their class. Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, the book’s scribes, were never enormous speculators on why this should be, preferring not to blur their clear epidemiological attest with thought. But you can understand on a bowel tier why it might adversely affect all of us. Oliver probably does not wake up thinking of himself as emblematic of a rigged method. If all debate about equality is refracted through individuals, then nobody is reprehensible enough to stand for the injustice of advantage, and if you want to represent the underdog, you have to be so oppressed yourself that you are almost dead. Personal credentials become the beginning and end of a battle that cannot be won on that territory. A tranche of ruling will conclude that the debate is too tedious to bother with, or, as Peter York once archly said:” I’m just waiting for Gardeners’ Question Time to start talking about the inequality between my wisteria and my hydrangeas .”

I don’t have the answer, by the way: but I know it won’t be resolved by rice, and it would be facilitated if the super-rich tried superhumanly hard-boiled not to be jerks.

Is Michael Gove barking up the right tree?

Michael Gove is not the go-to politician if your main issue is puppies- shortly thereafter his stand against bird-dog” punishment collars”( remote-controlled collars that allow you to blast your dog with an electric shock or, more commonly, cold breath where reference is misbehaves ), he went back on the idea of a forbidding. Now, though, he has come out against puppy farms. He will find few people who won’t support him in this: nonetheless much you distrust him and hopelessnes of his Singapore-in-the-channel vision for Britain, you must despise more anyone who would malnourish a puppy for currency. If there is one thing besides Bake Off we could all sign up to, surely this “couldve been” it?

Gove, like Boris Johnson, has apparently turned to Facebook for intel on how to realize himself seem leaderly, except his pup whistle is not Islamophobia but real bird-dogs. There is a peculiar quality to the animal-rights activism on Facebook. You would think it would be fluffy because animals are, but it often dissolves up in a singular home, calling for the death penalty for unprincipled puppy-farm owneds or old-fashioned evidence revival justice, where people who leave bird-dogs in red-hot autoes are, themselves, locked in hot cars.

The enormous boon of pup-rights is that they can’t readily be aligned politically, so people who wouldn’t be happy with far-right connotations, or those of the left, can decide snugly into some righteous indignation that doesn’t involve smashing their neighbours’ windows. This is the happy place of the modern Tory moderate: all the intensity and zeal of communal feeling, but nothing of the unfortunate and ugly ethno-nationalism.

The only problem is that anger is not politically constructive: some spleen is inevitable, but simply as a side-dish. For generative social eyesight, you may have to look somewhere other than social media.

No deal: how the euro has become the talk of British holidaymakers

” Imagine how inexpensive who had allegedly been, before June 2016 …” This is the staple holiday conversation, replicated by every Brit in the eurozone, every seven times, sometimes amended by the peculiar:” Well, that would still have been expensive, even when you got EUR1. 39 to the PS1″, and culminating in the regular blowup:” One to blood one! We might as well have gone to Sweden and consume five quid on an apple .” Many things could change the climate, when autumn comes: the publication of the no-deal Armageddon scenarios may deliver MPs to their gumptions. But these undertakings in Carrefour, going pointlessly mugged to no one’s benefit, will supply an interesting background dirge.

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

Colombian veterinarian accused of ‘cruel’ surgery to turn puppies into dope mules

/ by / Tags: , , , ,

Andres Lopez Elorez faces US court for embed puppies with heroin after being expelled from Spain

A veterinarian is accused of implanting liquid heroin in puppies to turn them into drug mules for a Colombian trafficking ring.

Colombian-born Andres Lopez Elorez is indicated in a US federal court in Brooklyn on Tuesday after being expelled from Spain, where he was arrested in 2015.

Lopez Elorez, 38, who also goes by the surname Lopez Elorza, absconded in 2005 when dominions arrested about two dozen supposed traffickers in Colombia.

His arrest was part of a 12 -year Drug Enforcement Administration investigation. If imprisoned on scheme costs, he gambles spending at least 10 times and potentially life behind bars.

Authorities allege that between September 2004 and January 2005 Elorez was a member of a Colombian ring smuggling heroin into the US applying many procedures, including human and dog couriers.

It is believed the dogs were sent on commercial flights to New York, where the drugs were cut out of them. Examiners believe the puppies would have died in the process, but it was unknown how many were involved.

” As alleged in the indictment, Elorez is not only a drug trafficker, he also betrayed a veterinarian’s pledge to prevent animal bear where reference is utilized his surgical knowledge in a brutal scheme to smuggle heroin in the abdomens of puppies ,” US attorney Richard Donoghue said.” Dogs are man’s most special friend and, as the defendant is about to learn, we are drug dealers’ worst enemy .”

Ten puppies search for and during a 2005 raid on a farm in Colombia, DEA officials said. Five culminated up running away, three died from infection and two were adopted, including one that became a drug-sniffing dog for Colombian police, officials said.

” Over era, narcotic organisations’ unquenchable thirst for profit results them to do unbelievable crimes like use innocent puppies for medicine hiding ,” the head of the DEA’s New York division, James Hunt, said.

Associated Press and Agence France-Presse contributed to this report .

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

Here’s the main issue behind the Jamie Oliver jerk rice row- and it’s not cultural appropriation

/ by / Tags: , , , ,

People object to a minted guy making money from an inauthentic food, while those who eat the real thing get diddly-squat

You can discover, even from a great distance, that some arguments have a hot, intractable core that won’t be easily cooled, in the same way that you can tell by watching a pub engage whether it is about a fraternal disloyalty or somebody spilling something. The fracas over the luminary chef Jamie Oliver’s punchy jerk rice- which led the Labour MP Dawn Butler to tweet:” Your schmuck rice is not OK. This appropriation from Jamaica needs to stop”- is just such a row.

Oliver followers thrust themselves awake. Which bit of his rice is wrong, again? That he would use flavouring that originated in another culture; that he would get the seasoning wrong; or that he would misapply it to the wrong ingredient, “jerk” being intended for meat , not rice? What do the liberals require? Where was Butler when he started using mostarda di frutta on pasta? Won’t someone must be considered the Italians?” And what about tea ?”, contributed the contrarians.” Is that culture appropriation? Now we’ve appropriated it, is anyone else drinking it suitable it back down us ?” The untrained observer, arriving from space, would assume we were a nation that furiously and irrationally adoration, or detested, Oliver, whereupon discussing him at all itself becomes an act of cultural appropriation. But that’s not really what’s going on.

If you never borrow anything, that is a creed of insularity and parochialism. Because this is an easy point to score, a lot of beings are coming in to bat for Oliver who wouldn’t start near his dork rice with a 10 -ft spoon, and never tasted his jollof rice either, with which he doubly insulted an entire continent in 2014, manufacturing it nothing like it was supposed to taste, and clumsily attributing it to Ghana when its ancestries are rivalry. It was like going in to a Greek restaurant and telling a Turkish coffee, except multiplied by 17 and offering to make it yourself, with cloves.

But what people are angry about isn’t the homely cross-pollination of one lusciou thing with another, but that a person who is already minted is making a load of coin out of a bastardised version of something, while the people who eat the authentic dish form diddly-squat from it. It is just another inequality story, exploding through the social surface like a hickey. We’ll mash it for a bit, it will hurt, some gunk will come out. The underlying predicaments will remain unchanged, until a fresh simmer explosions, maybe when Jeremy Paxman propels his own street-style label.

What is illuminating is that all this illustrates the place made a decade ago in the book The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Cultures Nearly Always Do Better that inequality is bad for everyone; it obligates everyone angrier, rich and good; everyone’s mental health slumps, whatever their class. Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, the book’s writers, were never enormous adventurers on why this should be, preferring not to obscure their clear epidemiological evidence with speculation. But you can understand on a bowel degree why it might adversely affect all of us. Oliver probably does not wake up thinking of himself as emblematic of a rigged plan. If all debate about equality is refracted through individuals, then nobody is culpable enough to stand for the injustice of privilege, and if you want to represent the underdog, you have to be so oppressed yourself that you are almost dead. Personal credentials become the beginning and end of a battle that cannot be acquired on that territory. A tranche of opinion will conclude that the debate is too monotonous to bother with, or, as Peter York formerly archly said:” I’m just waiting for Gardeners’ Question Time to start talking about the inequality between my wisteria and my hydrangeas .”

I don’t have the answer, by the way: but I know it won’t be resolved by rice, and it would help if the super-rich tried superhumanly hard not to be jerks.

Is Michael Gove barking up the right tree?

Michael Gove is not the go-to politician if your main issue is puppies- shortly after his stand against puppy” sanction collars”( remote-controlled collars that allow you to blast your bird-dog with an electric shock or, more commonly, cold breeze where reference is misbehaves ), he went back on the relevant recommendations of a injunction. Now, though, he has come out against puppy farms. He will find few people who won’t support him in this: nonetheless much you distrust him and hopelessnes of his Singapore-in-the-channel vision for Britain, you must despise more anyone who would malnourish a puppy for currency. If there is one thing besides Bake Off we could all sign up to, surely this would be it?

Gove, like Boris Johnson, has apparently turned to Facebook for intel on how to acquire himself seem leaderly, except his dog whistle is not Islamophobia but real hounds. There is a peculiar quality to the animal-rights activism on Facebook. You would think it would be fluffy because swine are, but it often intent up in a singular plaza, announcing for the death penalty for unscrupulous puppy-farm owners or age-old testament resurgence right, where people who leave bird-dogs in hot autoes are, themselves, locked in hot cars.

The great boon of pup-rights is that they can’t easily be aligned politically, so people who wouldn’t be happy with far-right overtones, or those of the left, can agree snugly into some righteous indignation that doesn’t involve blast their neighbours’ spaces. This is the happy place of the modern Tory moderate: all the intensity and zeal of communal rampage, but nothing of the unfortunate and ugly ethno-nationalism.

The only problem is that anger is not politically constructive: some spleen is inevitable, but simply as a side-dish. For generative social image, you may have to look somewhere other than social media.

No deal: how the euro has become the talk of British holidaymakers

” Imagine how inexpensive that would otherwise have been, before June 2016 …” This is the staple holiday conversation, repeated by every Brit in the eurozone, every seven hours, sometimes amended by the strange:” Well, that would still have been expensive, even when you got EUR1. 39 to the PS1″, and culminating in the regular explosion:” One to murderou one! We might as well have gone to Sweden and squander five quid on an apple .” Many things could change the climate, when autumn comes: the publication of the no-deal Armageddon scenarios may fetch MPs to their appreciations. But these escapades in Carrefour, get pointlessly mugged to no one’s benefit, will supply an interesting background dirge.

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

They owned an island, now they are urban poor: the tragedy of Altamira

Construction of the Belo Monte dam has cast men, women and children who lived rich lives along the Xingu River to the outskirts of Altamira, Brazils most violent city. Here, to the sound of gunfire, they must live behind barred windows, and buy food with money theyve never had or needed before

They owned an island, now they are urban poor: the tragedy of Altamira

They owned an island, now they are urban poor: the tragedy of Altamira

Construction of the Belo Monte dam has cast men, women and children who lived rich lives along the Xingu River to the outskirts of Altamira, Brazil’s most violent city. Here, to the sound of gunfire, they must live behind barred windows, and buy food with money they’ve never had – or needed before

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

Here’s the main issue behind the Jamie Oliver jerk rice row- and it’s not cultural appropriation

/ by / Tags: , , , ,

People object to a minted person making money from an inauthentic bowl, while those who eat the real thing get diddly-squat

You can hear, even from a great distance, that some statements have a hot, insoluble core that won’t be easily cooled, in the same way that you can tell by watching a tavern contend whether it is about a fraternal sellout or somebody spilling something. The fracas over the personality chef Jamie Oliver’s punchy jerk rice- which led to the loss the Labour MP Dawn Butler to tweet:” Your yank rice is not OK. This appropriation from Jamaica needs to stop”- is just such a row.

Oliver devotees pushed themselves awake. Which bit of his rice is wrong, again? That he would use spice that originated in another culture; that he would get the seasoning wrong; or that he would misapply it to the wrong part, “jerk” being intended for meat , not rice? What do the liberals crave? Where was Butler when he started exploiting mostarda di frutta on pasta? Won’t someone think of the Italians?” And what about tea ?”, added the contrarians.” Is that cultural appropriation? Now we’ve appropriated it, is anyone else drinking it suitable it back down us ?” The untrained commentator, arriving from space, would assume we were a nation that furiously and irrationally adored, or detested, Oliver, whereupon discussing him at all itself becomes an act of cultural appropriation. But that’s not really what’s going on.

If you never borrow anything, that is a creed of insularity and parochialism. Because this is an easy point to score, a lot of parties are coming in to bat for Oliver who wouldn’t get near his yank rice with a 10 -ft spoon, and never tasted his jollof rice either, with which he doubly reviled an whole continent in 2014, realise it nothing like it was supposed to taste, and clumsily attributing it to Ghana when its parentages are raced. It was like going in to a Greek restaurant and telling a Turkish coffee, except multiplied by 17 and offering to make it yourself, with cloves.

But what beings are angry about isn’t the homely cross-pollination of one deliciou thing with another, but that a person who is already minted is making a load of fund out of a bastardised version of something, while the people who eat the authentic food constitute diddly-squat from it. It is just another inequality story, exploding through the social scalp like a hickey. We’ll crush it for a bit, it will hurt, some gunk will come out. The underlying modes is unchanged, until a fresh steam starts, maybe when Jeremy Paxman launches his own street-style label.

What is illuminating is that all this illustrates the detail made a decade ago in the book The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Virtually Always Do Better that difference is bad for everyone; it acquires everyone angrier, rich and good; everyone’s mental health diminishes, whatever their class. Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, the book’s scribes, “ve never been” enormous plungers on why this should be, wishing not to blur their clear epidemiological sign with speculation. But you can understand on a gut degree why it might adversely affect all of us. Oliver probably does not wake up thinking of himself as emblematic of a rigged organisation. If all debate about equality is refracted through individuals, then nobody is culpable enough to stand for the sin of advantage, and if you want to represent the underdog, you have to be so subdued yourself that you are almost dead. Personal credentials become the beginning and end of a battle that cannot be triumphed on that territory. A tranche of ruling will conclude that the debate is too laborious to bother with, or, as Peter York once archly said:” I’m just waiting for Gardeners’ Question Time to start talking about the inequality between my wisteria and my hydrangeas .”

I don’t have the answer, by the way: but I know it won’t be resolved by rice, and it would be facilitated if the super-rich tried superhumanly hard not to be jerks.

Is Michael Gove barking up the privilege tree?

Michael Gove is not the go-to politician if your main issue is puppies- shortly thereafter his stand against puppy” penalty collars”( remote-controlled collars that allow you to blast your puppy with an electric shock or, more commonly, cold air when it misbehaves ), he went back on the idea of a outlaw. Now, though, he has come out against puppy farms. He will find few people who won’t support him in this: however much you distrust him and anguish of his Singapore-in-the-channel vision for Britain, you must despise more anyone who would malnourish a puppy for money. If there is one thing besides Bake Off we could all sign up to, surely this would be it?

Gove, like Boris Johnson, has apparently turned to Facebook for intel on how to oblige himself seem leaderly, except his bird-dog whistling is not Islamophobia but real dogs. There is a peculiar quality to the animal-rights activism on Facebook. You would think it would be fluffy because animals are, but it often discontinues up in a peculiar residence, calling for the death penalty for dishonest puppy-farm owneds or age-old evidence resurgence justice, where people who leave dogs in hot gondolas are, themselves, locked in hot cars.

The great boon of pup-rights is that they can’t easily be aligned politically, so people who wouldn’t be happy with far-right connotations, or those of the left, can colonize snugly into some righteous rage that doesn’t involve break their neighbours’ windows. This is the happy place of the modern Tory moderate: all the intensity and zeal of communal rage, but none of the unfortunate and ugly ethno-nationalism.

The only problem is that anger is not politically constructive: some spleen is inevitable, but exclusively as a side-dish. For generative social perception, you may have to look somewhere other than social media.

No deal: how the euro has become the talk of British holidaymakers

” Imagine how inexpensive that would otherwise have been, before June 2016 …” This is the staple holiday conversation, repeated by every Brit in the eurozone, every seven minutes, sometimes amended by the peculiar:” Well, that would still have been expensive, even when you got EUR1. 39 to the PS1″, and culminating in the regular blowup:” One to blood one! We might as well have gone to Sweden and exhaust five quid on an apple .” Many things could change the weather, when autumn comes: the publication of the no-deal Armageddon scenarios may accompany MPs to their feels. But these undertakings in Carrefour, getting pointlessly mugged to no one’s benefit, will supply an interesting background dirge.

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

Undocumented, vulnerable, scared: the women who pick your food for$ 3 an hour

/ by / Tags: , , , , , ,

In the fields of south Texas Mexican women labor long hours in dangerous modes under the ever-present threat of deportation

On a rainy, pre-dawn Monday morning in the fields of the Rio Grande Valley along the Mexican border in south Texas, little constellations of flashlights wink in the different regions of the light-green field. They are held by undocumented immigrants, principally from Mexico, and largely living in fear of arrest and deportation but wielding all the same to provide for their families. Their paws twist the relationship on bunches of parsley or hack stalks of kale until their palms blister. Most of Texas is still asleep.

Many of them are paid on a contract basis, by the box. A carton of cilantro will earn construction workers$ 3; experienced farmworkers say they can fill one within an hour, which entails a usual 5am to 6pm work day would pay them $39 total. The run can run from physically unpleasant and banal( cilantro, loot, beets) to outright agonizing and dangerous( watermelon, parsley, grapefruit ).

Farmworkers
Farmworkers hand over the collard dark-green bunches that they reaped in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

The few women who work in the fields face even more afflictions. Specimen of workplace sexual harassment and assault are widespread and are both underreported and under-prosecuted. It is common for women to capitulate to a supervisor’s betterments because she can’t risk losing her job or expulsion. Most of these women are supporting progenies as well.

In the fields of south Texas, those women represent a diverse cross-section of lives upturned by drug-related and domestic violence in Mexico. Under new US immigration protocols, these are extraordinarily tense seasons for immigrants- getting caught by officials could represent being sent back or having your kids placed under a enclosure. And yet the women included in this piece refused to hide their faces or reform their names.

They want their floors told.

Janet, 36

Janet,
Janet, 36, left, and her father Edith, 55 constitute for a photo outside Janet’s house. Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

” I contemplate I labour evenly a little faster as the three men ,” Janet Castro says, crouching over and slicing the beginnings from the greens of the cilantro collect. A 36 -year-old veteran of fieldwork( “shes been” picking grow since she was 17 ), Castro is able to hold a speech without stopping the swift movement of her spear. A bandanna covers her nose and mouth to keep the headache-inducing cilantro scent out; otherwise the headache last-places for hours after she’s left the field.

Parsley is worse:” There is a milk in the branches of the parsley that gets on us when we cut it ,” she clarifies. As a cause, one day in the fields snip parsley can necessitate two weeks of itchy, stinging skin that is rough to the touch.” We can’t wear gauntlets because the boss says a piece of the gauntlet could get into the product ,” she illustrates, and long sleeves was able to press the milk into the skin.

‘I’m access to it ,” she shrugs, in her stoic course, as she scratches her scaly arm.

Janet has worked with the same supervisor for nine years. She describes him as a good guy who has even lent her $200 when she needed it. Despite bending over for most of the day, she says she doesn’t suffer the same back pain that other farmworkers do.” I’m really fast at the onion, but there are some men who say I am taking their work. The response I have is that this work is for my children .”

Janet met her husband the first year she started working in the fields. Back at home, they have three children, each with developmental problems; one, the midriff daughter, has autism and needs a part-time caretaker. Her older son has suffered epileptic convulsions since he was a baby, and the youngest is starting to show developmental topics as well. Janet says her doctors imagine the source of her children’s troubles are the compounds used in the fields, but her undocumented status guided her to never search action at law. Plus, she didn’t want to lose her job.

Her solace is the Catholic church, and on her one day off- Sunday- she takes her family there. Afterwards they race residence, to avoid any potential run-ins with immigration authorities. She says she has heard rumors of immigration stingings at states parties and collects after religion, and though she says she does not live in fear, she still says she doesn’t like to go that risk.

She hopes that someday she might be able to call herself an American citizen.” I merely hope there is a way for us to get certificates, because some of us are really working here. Others are lazy and stay home, but I’m really working hard ,” she says before putting her youngest to bed, seven hours before she’ll need to arrive at the parsley battlefield the next morning.

Edith, 55

Edith,
Edith came to the US practically 20 years ago.’ I came to this country to give my family a better life. Work is very hard, but I don’t mind. We have to work .’ Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

Edith is Janet’s mom, though her outspoken manner opposes crisply with her daughter’s low-key, reticent behaviour. If Edith comes off as strong-headed, she says that her life has necessitated it.

Edith cultivated as a paramedic in Mexico, but she could barely make ends meet.” I lived in total privation in Mexico ,” she says, her gazes moistening.” My home was just a wood shack and when it rained we would get wet. I came here because this is a country of possibilities .”

Today she lives with her daughter Janet and her daughter’s lineage, but years ago their lives were turned upside down, shortly after Edith came across the Rio Grande River in the early 1990 s alone in an inner tube at night.

Four months after Edith arrived and learnt project as a housekeeper for a neighbourhood vocalist, she navigated back to Veracruz, Mexico, to draw her three teenage offsprings across national borders. Janet and her sister, both adolescents then, experienced production as housekeepers as well, but were getting attacked by people as they trod residence from their jobs. One period, Janet’s sister accepted a move dwelling and disappeared. Her brother, Edith’s son, spotted his sister after weeks of searching in an apartment building in another town. It is a fact that she and another girl had been being held there against their will and mistreated. Edith’s son went to the police to report the crime, and Edith says the abductors were jailed for a week, her son was also punished: he was deported.” The sleuth simply told me to call if my daughter got abducted again ,” Edith echoes with disgust,” and that’s when I decided to move towns “.

Starting over, Edith threw herself into work in the fields.” I don’t mind the hard work ,” she says,” I came to this country to fight .” Over her two decades of work in the fields, Edith has earned herself a reputation among the men as a tough chingona – a badass girl. Once, while working the watermelon fields where rattlesnakes are notorious, Edith expended her paramedic abilities to save the life of a worker who was bitten by a serpent:” I set my opening to it[ his leg] and sucked out the venom and spit it out .” Such bravery has turned her into a kind of mentor to other women working in the fields.

Farmworkers
Farmworkers hand over the collard light-green knots that they gathered in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

She also informally attorneys other female farmworkers against acquiescing to the pressure of men soliciting sex in exchange for better working conditions.” I always tell them,’ We have worked hard to be here , now don’t let yourself down .'” She says she still understands young women taken off by the supervisors to corners of the fields, but she has hope:” People know their rights a lot better now than they used to .”

Commonplace labor topics such as intimidation, refusal of collective bargaining claims, wage withholding or payable overtime work are also immense hurdles that they have few recourses to fight.

A report by Human Rights Watch notes that although US law entitles undocumented workers to workplace cares,” the US government’s interest in protecting unauthorized laborers from abuse conflicts with its interest in deporting them .” That report was written in 2015, but President Trump’s heightened drive for deportation and borderline close has only constructed things more impossible for undocumented farmworkers attempting to protect their proletariat rights.

That’s part of why Edith still considers giving up everything and returning with her family to Mexico.

” When you’re illegal here, it’s like you’re in prison. If you need assistance, there’s nowhere to go .”

Maria Rebecca, 23

María
Maria Rebecca, 23, and her daughter. She was eight when she started helping her father picking strawberries in Michoacan. Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

Maria Rebecca came to the US when she was pregnant with her second juvenile three years ago, leaving her older son with her parents back in Michoacan.

” My mommy spent her whole life working in the area[ in Mexico ], and the only reason she stopped was because one of the veins in her eye popped while she was working .”

Her sister and her daddy are still back in Michoacan working the fields, and it was her other sister who announced her to Texas, where she had already moved to.

” My sister knew that I desired working in the fields, and she “ve been told” I could make a lot more fund here .” Back in Mexico she would make about $30 a few weeks. Here, she could obligate $200 a week- if, that is, she was willing to take on the most dangerous types of work- gleaning in the orchards. She was: farm work is Maria Rebecca’s life.

” I started working in the fields when I was eight. I checked that the rest of the boys were buying lollipops after institution, but we didn’t have enough money for me to buy them, so I decided to work .”

She says that while still in elementary school, she quitted attending five days a week so that she could work a few days a week and give a little spending money. What maintained her in institution was the free lunch on those epoches; at home, banquets were more irregular, she says with a shrug, as she shakes on a bench beneath a pecan tree in her sister’s figurehead ground. Her daughter sits softly beside her, wide-eyed with her little hoof barely dangling off the bench.

Throughout middle school Maria Rebecca says she continued working in the fields, priding herself on reaching enough money to buy instant noodles for lunch. By ninth grade, she dropped out of school completely and turned to farm work full era, but she does not speak about it with much regret. While some teenagers feel pride by excelling in school or sports, Maria Rebecca felt dignity in excelling at farm work. She narrates her working experiences like a more privileged person might recount their travel escapades.” I remember running the strawberry fields and having to walk up the side of a mound barefoot because it was too muddy to wear boots. The owners kept the ocean loping to keep the strawberries fresh, but we would slip and tumble all the time ,” she says with a laugh.

Maria,
Maria reaps grapefruits in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

Despite the harsh work conditions she suffered in Mexico, she says fieldwork in the US is even more demanding because her wage is not paid hourly- ie consistent irrespective of how hard she works- but instead by the box.” Here we are paid by weight, so you have to work very fast. Here it is a lot harder .”

The Rio Grande Valley is renowned for its winter citrus season, when small-town citrus carnivals boast luscious local oranges and grapefruit. Early one morning during this year’s harvest, Maria Rebecca is already up on a ladder, contacting precariously for each return, to drop down into her giant canvas bag.

The physicality of orchard work is astonishingly difficult and dangerous. She leans a ladder slippery with dew and torrent against a tree, where it catches- hopefully tightly- on the diverges. Then she makes her road up the 14 -foot ladder, all the way to the top, to the last rung. Along the style, she is stretching to reach grapefruit, and tugging at them to get them to exhaust and fall. Any that collision the floor can’t be used, so she collects them all in a purse that is slung crossbody and hanging on one side of her hip. The suitcase weighs anywhere between 60 to 80 lb when full of fruit. One missed step on the ladder, or a lean too far to the side, and she’ll fall.

That’s already happened to her twice this year. Once, her paw slipped off the ladder step during a rainstorm, yanking her poise backwards and communicating her to the ground, the crate arrive on top of her. On her style down, she threw the back of her front against the angle of a tractor trailer. She describes knowing concussion syndromes( although she says she has never heard the word “concussion” ). A doctor’s visit was out of the question.” Without articles, I just try to not effect a few problems ,” she clarifies, twisting her opening to the side and ogling down to brush dirt off her daughter’s jeans. She was also unaware of her legal rights in seeking compensation for her injury.

Still, Maria Rebecca is afraid that the work could one day hurt her poorly sufficient to made her children at risk. After her daylight in the orchard, she dotes on her three-year-old daughter, whose black mane she carefully combs back and secures with minuscule barrettes. She lives in her sister’s nice mobile home, and maintains a straighten and stable procedure for their own children( her sister sells Tupperware from the back of a gondola ).

” I can’t imagine not working in the fields ,” she says.” I ever want to keep working, because I never require a guy to be able to control me and ask me how I spend his money. But I reckon I am going to leave this work. I fell again last week. I consider I want to go to Mexico .”

Blanca, 36

Blanca,
Blanca, 36, says she is good at pedicures, but is not able to do that in the US because she is undocumented.’ It’s harder for women to work the fields. Some can, but I’m just not used to it .’ Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

Blanca first entered the US more than a decade ago by simply walking across one of the bridges that relate Mexico to the Rio Grande Valley, she says, a bit nervously, since things are different now.” Now to get here you have to pay …” she says, although she leaves unclear whether she intends compensating the coyotes who traffic parties across national borders or with your life, as many migrants do.

When she firstly came to the US, she found her labor options annoying.” I know how to do pedicures really well, I am really skilled at it actually. But I can’t do that kind of work here, because I don’t have articles .” So she went back to Mexico, taking their own families with her.

But life was not much easier in Tamaulipas state, especially after her husband left two years ago to look for better-paying work back in the US. He find it in the fields, and when we first match and sit in a gondola to speak, he kneels just out of earshot in the soil, pulling beets while keeping a distrustful see on her. She questioned her husband’s allow before agreeing to be interviewed.

Blanca says that during the time that he was gone, leaving her behind in Mexico to raise their five girls, she started to feel scared for her refuge.” We lives in a neat situate in Mexico, but I lives in a rancho with very few people around, so anytime a boy showed up at the house, I was frightened .” Plus, with a home full of boys- her five children range from 20 to three- she started to worry about their own future.” There’s a lot of crime, and I didn’t want my sons working for those robbers. I missed them working for good .” Five months back, she ultimately packed up the children to join him. She shuns the issue of how to they bridged this time.

Farmworkers
Farmworkers pick beets in the Rio Grande Valley. Photograph: Veronica G Cardenas/ The Guardian

Like her husband, Blanca has taken on fieldwork, even though she does not recall she is well-suited to it.” It’s harder for women to work the fields. Some can, but I’m just not used to it .” She still hasn’t experienced a summertime of working in the fields of south Texas, but she is already dreading the hot.” When we walk in the sunshine it is so bad. But too, when it rains it’s bad very, because your legs get wearied from stepping in the silt. And lifting the onions … it’s really heavy .” She tried working the citrus trees like Maria Rebecca but says she quit because it was too hard.

Still, she says she wouldn’t sell fieldwork for life back in Mexico.” I enjoy that here, the kids can go to a good school and that we can find work ,” she says.” I don’t think I will ever go back to Mexico- only if I am action .” She says that she still lives with a high degree of uncertainty:” I rent my home, so we could get kicked out ,” she interprets, as she gesticulates around the broken-down trailer home her children are chasing fly-covered puppies out front of.” It’s hard to live this method because you could go to work and only not come back because the immigration officials pictured up.

” Trump says he doesn’t want immigrants here, and I think it’s obvious he merely hates immigrants. But my question is, why don’t you want us if we work so hard ?”

Shannon Sims is also a member of the International Women’s Media Foundation and funding recipients of the Howard G Buffett Fund for Women Correspondent

Read more: www.theguardian.com

READ MORE

They owned an island , now they are urban poor: the tragedy of Altamira

Construction of the Belo Monte dam has cast gentlemen , women and children who lived rich lives along the Xingu River to the outskirts of Altamira, Brazils most violent city. Here, to the sound of gunfire, they must live behind prohibited openings, and buy food with money theyve never had or needed before

They owned an island , now they are urban poor: the tragedy of Altamira

READ MORE