What do Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and Mark Zuckerberg have in common? They all claim to be religion. As a brand-new analyse evidences, beings guess the most difficult of non-believers. What does this mean for US voters?
The notion that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is examining a run for president in 2020 seemed fanciful until the last days of last year, when he posted a word( on Facebook, naturally) that speak: Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah from Priscilla, Max, Beast and me, be submitted to his wife, his daughter and his hound. A generic holiday message from a CEO, you might speculate. But then a commenter reminded Zuckerberg that he had long identified as an atheist. What had changed? The refute was swift: I was developed Jewish and then I went through a interval where I interrogated situations, but now I feel religion were critical.
This statement, more even than his proposed journey around all 50 territories or his much-hailed visits to key, first-in-the-nation commonwealths such as Iowa, suggested that the tech hotshot was eyeing the White House. For Zuckerberg was tacitly declaring one of the golden rules of US politics: Americans wont vote for an atheist for president.
That maxim has been reinforced by a new survey, which shows that people across the world are prepared to think the worst of atheists, believing that those without faith are more capable of dishonest behaviour than those who have it.
The man behind the study, Will Gervais of the University of Kentucky, told the Times he had been induced to study specific topics by data that suggested US voters are less willing to elect an atheist than any other category of campaigner, including gay or Muslim. Gervais said he believes that voters believe creed in God essential for morality and deem atheists moral wildcards who lack restraint and are capable of anything, including knocking puppies, cheating at cards, light-footed cannibalism.
US political operatives have long worked on this assumption. Witness the leaked Democratic party documents that testified allies of Hillary Clinton in 2016 mulling a is our intention to decorate Bernie Sanders as an atheist, guessing it is unable to expense him crucial percentage points in God-fearing countries such as Kentucky and West Virginia. Sanders, who is currently Jewish, rushed to assert that he was no atheist.
This means that no openly non-believing candidate has won the presidential nomination of either major party. Even representations whose personal ethic has been famously doubt have hastened to declare their attraction for God. The most grievous instance is surely the present incumbent of the White House. Despite conducting a life dedicated to the devotion of mammon, Donald Trump was is adopted by white evangelical voters, who abode his declarations of passion and learnt him as preferable to church-going Clinton. It suggests that, while Americans expect their politicians to claim religion in God, they barely necessitate consistency.
Read more: www.theguardian.com