What do Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and Mark Zuckerberg have in common? They all admit to be religious. As a brand-new investigate proves, beings recollect the most difficult of non-believers. What does this mean for US voters?
The notion that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is examining a run for president in 2020 seemed fanciful until the last days of last year, when he posted a word( on Facebook, naturally) that read: Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah from Priscilla, Max, Beast and me, referring to his wife, his daughter and his puppy. A generic carnival letter from a CEO, you are able to consider. But then a commenter prompted Zuckerberg that he had long identified as an atheist. What had changed? The answer was speedy: I was created Jewish and then I went through a age where I interrogated happenings, but now I imagine religion is very important.
This statement, more even than his proposed expedition around all 50 commonwealths or his much-hailed visits to key, first-in-the-nation states such as Iowa, suggested that the tech wizard was eyeing the White House. For Zuckerberg was tacitly recognise one of the golden rules of US politics: Americans wont vote for an atheist for president.
That maxim has been reinforced by a brand-new analyse, which shows that people across the world are prepared to think the worst of atheists, believing that those without faith are more capable of immoral practice than those who have it.
The man behind the study, Will Gervais of the University of Kentucky, told the Times he had been motivated to experiment the topic by data that suggested US voters are less willing to elect an atheist than any other category of campaigner, including homosexual or Muslim. Gervais said he supposes that voters conceive ideology in God essential for justice and regard atheists moral wildcards who need restraint and be able to make anything, including knocking puppies, cheating at placards, light-footed cannibalism.
US political spies have all along been worked on this assumption. Witness the leaked Democratic party documents that testified friends of Hillary Clinton in 2016 pondering a is our intention to coat Bernie Sanders as an atheist, imagining it is unable to cost him all-important percentage points in God-fearing nations such as Kentucky and West Virginia. Sanders, who is Jewish, rushed to assert that he was no atheist.
This is necessary that no openly non-believing candidate has won the presidential nomination of either major party. Even illustrations whose personal morality has been famously suspect have hastened to maintain their attraction for God. The most abhorrent illustration is surely the present incumbent of the White House. Despite extending their own lives dedicated to the praise of mammon, Donald Trump was embraced by white-hot evangelical voters, who accepted his declarations of fondnes and considered him as preferable to church-going Clinton. It suggests that, while Americans expect their politicians to profess faith in God, they hardly challenge consistency.
Read more: www.theguardian.com