All dogs are good dogs, and that’s what the Twitter account WeRateDogs is all about.
Unfortunately, some Twitter trolls like one identified Brant( Brint? Brent? Bront ?) couldn’t seem to understand. Brant tweeted at WeRateDogs to air some grievances against the account’s seemingly lenient standards.
Brant particularly took issue with the detail rating every bird-dog as a 10, or even a 11 or 12 out of 10. Quite the paradox.
WeRateDogs shot back with some infallible logic 😛 TAGEND
But Brant was not satisfied.
Brant objection the dog-rating account to show some 3s or even 5 or 6-rated dogs on the account.
Of course, he was quickly refuted. Because at WeRateDogs, a 3 or 5 does not subsist. Every bird-dog is a superior dog.
Looks like Brant will have to find his own dog-rating method. We think he’ll be hard-pressed to find a better one.
Never be the guy who debates against cute dogs.